THE SYSTEM IS BROKEN: ROT AT THE CORE OF THE US GOVERNMENT

Subtitle: Longing for a True Third Party

My historical novel IMMORTAL briefly made one of the bestseller lists in Italy over the summer, and I went to Italy in October to do some PR to support the novel. There was a lively radio interview, and at the radio station, I was filmed for a website that promotes Tuscany. I have wonderful things to say about the region. It’s heaven. The art, the food, the wine, the land, the sky.

During the filming of the PR video, I cast aspersions on Berlusconi. He is openly corrupt, controlling the media in Italy and changing or creating legislation to suit his whims. Those are just two superficial examples of Berlusconi’s flagrant corruption.

After filming, I discussed my clip with the radio station manager, an intelligent man who was fluent in English. “Don’t worry,” he said. “Tuscany is the most left of all Italy. You can say what you want about Berlusconi.”

“But why do Italians elect him in the first place?” I pressed.

He thought for a few moments before answering. “Because people hope that if he is in charge, they will get away with corruption, too.”

Those words have stayed with me as I have surveyed the rank state of our country over the last few months. It’s almost impossible to know where to start, there is so much moral decay. Maybe Obama is the place to begin.

Wikileaks: in general, I support transparency. I like the internet as a place for truth to be exposed. We live in a world full of lies, lies, and more lies. We live in a world that is increasingly run by large corporations, and those entities do not have the best interests of individual humans at heart. Remember asbestos and Johns Mansville? Johns Mansville knew that “this disease (cancer caused by asbestos) is irreversible and permanent….” They knew this fact and continued to leave asbestos workers with no protective equipment: BECAUSE IT PROFITTED THEM TO NEGLECT THE WORKERS. (This quote is from Paul Brodeur’s book “Outrageous Misconduct.”)

Muse upon the cigarette companies and all the diseases caused by smoking cigarettes. Cigarette companies have known for decades that smoking causes lung cancer and a host of other painful, ravaging diseases. They hid this fact, and, it is alleged, actively campaigned to minimize the dangers: BECAUSE IT PROFITTED THEM TO DO SO.

Now consider the lethal dangers of msg and other excitotoxins that irreparably damage people’s brains and lead to a host of neurological disorders; high fructose corn syrup that damages the human metabolism and leads to obesity and diabetes; mercury in vaccines that is implicated in illnesses including autism; and pesticides and plastics that cause cancer, infertility, low sperm count, etc etc etc. Now think about who profits from poisoning the people this way: Big Pharma, Big Agribusiness, the food conglomerates, the medical establishment (which is largely run by Big Pharma), biotech companies.

Follow the money, always. Ask: who is profiting? That will show you who is lying, cheating, and defrauding individuals.

We have to pay steeply for organic food: when did it become acceptable for Americans to pay for the privilege of not being poisoned? What kind of upside down world is that?

Note that the big food conglomerate corporations have gotten involved with organic farming because of the monies involved—and they have diluted the standards.

Back to Obama, wikileaks, and corruption. In general, I support transparency because how else are we going to expose corruption and hold Big Pharma, Big Agribusiness, the food conglomerates, the medical establishment, biotech companies, and THE US GOVERNMENT accountable for their choices and actions? For their deceit and the harm it causes?

There is no evidence that Obama is interested in accountability.

Uphold transparency, but neither wikileaks nor anyone else should publish the names of individual operatives who are trying to help Americans. This goes back to protecting the individual. Yes, publish the names of executives who, for example, promoted the practice of predatory lending based on race, which left scores of African Americans and Hispanic Americans bankrupt and foreclosed. Publish the names of those crooks. But leave out the names of double agents in Al Qaeda. Those people have enough to worry about—they are in danger of their lives every moment of every day.

Re wikileaks and Obama, John Bolton at The Guardian writes that Barack Obama is a bigger danger than wikileaks because Obama refuses to understand that America’s interests are seriously threatened—are, in fact, at stake of survival.

But that’s not the only way that Obama has betrayed the American people. Let’s go back to predatory lending practices based on racial profiling. WHY AREN’T THOSE PEOPLE IN JAIL? Is it because, as Noam Chomsky says, Obama is a creature of the financial institutions, that they expected to be paid back and were?

The financial institutions were let off the hook and bailed out with billions of dollars: Obama was good to them!

With Obama at the helm, Big Business has won so many legislative victories that it must be considered State Sponsored. For one small example, note the recent passage of the fraudulently named “Food Safety Act,” which will limit American’s access to herbal and vitamin supplements—except the ones produced by, you know it, Big Pharma. This is a big score for Big Pharma, which runs the medical establishment by funding medical schools and thus controlling the information which doctors are actually taught. But I’m not surprised at the passage of this act. When Obama named Vilsack as secretary of agriculture, Obama was explicitly stating that he was indebted to Big Pharma. Vilsack is Monsanto’s bestest friend.

Regarding the “Food Safety Act,” I published on this blog a letter I emailed to my senators, Gillibrand and Schumer. Gillibrand did not deign to respond. Some lackey of Schumer’s emailed me a condescending, patronizing response that barely took notice of what I was saying. Here’s my question: how much has Big Pharma and Big Agribusiness contributed to Gillibrand and Schumer?

Why is it that big corporations with expensive lobbyists who lay a lot of money around are now controlling legislation? State sponsored business under guise of entrepreneurship: COMMUNISM. And have you noticed how the true American entrepreneurs, the real American heros, small businesses, are being taxed out of existence?

Obama talks about going beyond the constraints of the constitution; the sentence that will eventually follow this is “Some pigs are more equal than others.” You can bet that Obama that brilliant orator will say it so it sounds real pretty.

So Obama is weak, he is a communist, he refuses to protect America’s interests in the world or even to see the dangers we face, he has probably ordered state department employees to spy at the UN, he doesn’t pursue accountability for predatory lending practices based on racial profiling, and he has sold out to the financial institutions and to Big Pharma.

But the Republicans aren’t any better. It was their economic policies that landed the world in the economic crisis we are in. While the free market works good most of the time, it MUST be regulated. Why? Because People Are Corrupt. Some people. In an unregulated environment, clever, amoral people will figure out how to bend, twist, and distort the system FOR PROFIT. Those distortions will hurt the environment and lead to… the largest gap between the haves and the have nots in a long, long while. Robert Creamer on the Huffington Post wrote that “Republicans… eviscerated rules that held Wall Street, Big Oil, and private insurance companies accountable to the public. They allowed and encouraged the recklessness of the big Wall Street banks that ultimately collapsed the economy and cost 8 million Americans their jobs. They ignored exploding health care costs, gave the drug companies open season to gouge American consumers…” (posted July 13, 2010)

It comes back to this issue of accountability, which Obama refuses to face. Accountability is the dilemma exposed by wikileaks. And note to anyone reading this blog: I live in NYC, where all the bankers are doing just fine, financially. Hey Main Street, you are being screwed! Because while you suffer, Wall Street is still living real good.

Moreover, there is significant evidence that 9/11 did not happen as the Bush administration wants us to believe. Noam Chomsky claims there is no evidence that Al Quada carried out the attacks. Seven CIA veterans have come out to say explicitly that Americans are being lied to, that there is a massive cover up, that events did not unfold as the public is being led to believe. Raymond McGovern, a 27 year veteran of the CIA, wrote, “The present volume confronts us with evidence for an even more disturbing conclusion: that the 9/11 attacks were themselves orchestrated by the (Bush) administration precisely so they could be thus exploited.” (see www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_070922_seven_cia_veterans_c.htm)

So maybe the Bush administration engineered 9/11 so they could send America to War. At the very least, a group of knowledgeable people maintain that the official, sanitized version is just that: sanitized. Not to mention the racism in the Tea Party and even within the Republican party. And, oh my god, please, Sarah Palin? I really wanted to like her, as an expression of solidarity with other mothers, but her rank ignorance, vindictiveness (firing the librarian who refused to go along with Palin’s proposed book censorship), and corruption (check out the indications that the Palin camp was trying to skew Dancing With The Stars in Bristol’s favor)….

So the Democrats suck. The Republicans suck. What do we do about this sad state of affairs, about the decay of moral fiber in the US? A friend of mine said to me recently, “Traci, people are just more eviler than they used to be.”

Is that true?

~~~ “You have enemies? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life.”

~Winston Churchill ~~~

Being Grateful
· · ·

Being Grateful

BEING GRATEFUL

This morning was the Thanksgiving assembly at my little daughter’s school. She came in holding hands with a partner, lines of Kindergarten girls walking two by two up the center aisle. They wore orange-red-and-brown headdresses in the spirit of the season and tried not to skip and giggle, but to conduct themselves with dignity.

 

Once in her appointed place, my little one spotted me, and promptly made gestures at me, waving her mischievous hands around her head. She told me later that she was trying to ask me via sign language if I was wearing my Spock ears. I have a pair that I have been known to wear around the house… But no, I informed her, pinching her nose playfully. I just had my hair tucked behind my ears and it made my ears look pointy. I was not wearing my rubber Spock ears.

 

The girls, K through 3rd grade, sang a few songs of gratitude, a tradition going past 100 years at this school. The sweetness of their tuneful voices uplifted me, set me to ruminating on the blessings and joys of life. We ended with “America the Beautiful,” and I am grateful to live here, even if the TSA gropes me next time I board a flight.

 

And I am grateful for my sweet little one with her Spock questions and dancing eyes. My unruly 16 year old who breaks my heart half the time and then the other half makes me laugh until I cry–she’s a gift. A bittersweet gift, but a treasured one. My step-daughter is loving, sweet, and considerate. I’m lucky to have her. My friend Gerda is one of the world’s great fonts of spiritual wisdom, UFOlogists, and lovers of chocolate: I am happy she’s in my life. Geoffrey, Debra, Lori, Marcia, gorgeous Sarah N. and even cranky Paul: individuals I’m fortunate to know and enjoy. Thomasananda, I wish I saw more of you, but still, its always a joy to connect with you. Dani, Komilla, Rachel: you’re great!

 

Right now, I’m also grateful for and to my husband. He spoiled me with a luxurious purse as an anniversary gift, the kind of gorgeous accoutrement that I’d considered out of reach just now. It’s beautiful! And generous of him. Most generous of all, he recently admitted to me that he hasn’t always treated me the way he wants to. He said he’s aiming to be a better husband. That kind of honesty and vulnerability take courage. It takes a great soul to openly claim that. I am grateful for him, and for his presence in my life.
· · · · · ·

Letter to Senators Gillibrand and Schumer re the Leahy Bill

Nov 19, 2010

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand
Russell Senate Office Building, Room 478
Constitution and Delaware Avenues, NE
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator Gillibrand,

I am deeply concerned that Sen. Leahy’s Food Safety Accountability Act of 2010 (S. 3767) may be included in or attached to the Food Safety Bill (S. 510), either via the manager’s amendment package or as a floor amendment.

I was dismayed to read the original language of S. 3767, which contained new and draconian ten-year jail terms for adulterating or misbranding food. This was unacceptable because of the way the FDA interprets the words “adulterating” and “misbranding.” You could have gone to jail for ten years just for citing scientific research from leading universities about your food product!

I was pleased to learn that the bill has been amended. It now says you don’t go to jail for up to ten years unless you “consciously or recklessly disregard a risk of death or serious bodily injury.”
This is better, but unacceptably vague and subjective. Actual harm should be required for such a long jail term. In addition, this amendment included new language which both specifically targeted supplements and made a lapse in filing to the FDA subject to the full ten-year jail term (see the reference to subsection V of Section 301 of the Federal Food and Drug Act). Paperwork violations should not lead to ten years in jail or threats of such jail terms. Why was this new language added? How can it possibly be justified?

Senators are currently editing S. 510 behind closed doors, as they draft the Manager’s Amendment Package, which may be substituted in place of the current Food Safety bill. It could include the Leahy bill language, and the public may not have an opportunity to review such changes before the Senate votes. If changes are made, both the Senate and the public ought to have notice of them and a chance to comment before a vote.

As one of your constituents, I want you to know that I take dietary supplements regularly, and value their help in keeping my family healthy. The Leahy bill, even after improvement in some respects, is still a misguided attempt to protect our food supply or ensure the safety of supplements. There is still too much risk that natural product makers will be threatened, silenced, and penalized.

At this point, I wonder if it will soon be necessary to obtain a medical permit to buy carrots, because carrots are full of Vitamin A in the form of beta-carotene, which supports excellent eye health, among other benefits. If I buy carrots and support my eyes, I will not buy some expensive, harmful medication to do that–and Big Pharma loses money. Clearly this bill is the foot soldier of the big pharmaceutical companies, who are out to eradicate competition to their expensive and side-effect laden drugs. Only Big Pharma stands to gain from this bill–which is why they have paid Senators so much money to craft it. The American consumer will not be helped by this so-called “food safety” bill, they will be hurt by it.

If the United States Government wants to protect the American consumer, they will overhaul the FDA, which is a thoroughly corrupt institution and a shill for the chemical, pharmaceutical, bio-tech, and medical establishment industries.

Please oppose inclusion of the Leahy bill and its draconian jail terms in the Food Safety bill!

Sincerely,

Ms. Traci Slatton
New York, NY

 
****************
 
IMAGINE A WORLD WHERE YOU HAVE TO BUY CHAMOMILE TEA ON A BLACK MARKET, OR ELSE OBTAIN A SPECIAL LICENSE TO GET IT: THAT’S THE WORLD WHERE BIG PHARMA FORCES YOU TO TAKE AMBIEN OR SOME OTHER DRUG, INSTEAD OF YOU BEING ALLOWED TO EXERCISE YOUR FREEDOM AND RIGHT TO TAKE A NON-TOXIC HERBAL PRODUCT. THIS WORLD IS COMING. BIG PHARMA WANT$ THEIR PROFIT$. EVERY SALE OF CHAMOMILE TEA MIGHT BE A SALE OF LUNESTA LOST.
· · · ·

We MUST distrust the FDA, the medical establishment, and Big Pharma

Scientists leave Monsanto to work at the FDA during the approval process for the use of Bovine Growth Hormone in dairy cows. The FDA allows milk to be substantially more adulterated for consumer use. After bovine growth hormone is approved, the scientists return to their original jobs at Monsanto. See: NEXUS Magazine, several articles including June/July 2001, vol. 8 #4, “Milking the Truth with GE Hormones” by Jane Akre and Steve Wilson, also Aug/Sept 1998, vol. 5 #5, “The Health Dangers of Dairy Products,” by Robert Cohen, regarding scientist Dr. Margaret Miller

 
“Ironically, Merck holds the patent on combining the natural substance coenzyme Q10 with statin to prevent a lot of the statin side effects, but none of their patent-medicine statins have coenzyme Q10…. This patent prevents some of the side effects from their patent statin, so it’s possible they are not using the combination of coenzyme Q10 and their statin because doing so might admit liability. If they release this information, everyone will know, and they may have to admit that their drug was harmful.” Dr. Jonathan Wright, in Suzanne Somers BREAKTHROUGH: Life Altering Secrets from Today’s Cutting-Edge Doctors (New York: Crown Publishers) p. 52-53.
 
Big Pharma Scores Big Win: Medicine Herbs will disappear in Europe

It’s almost a done deal. We are about to see herbal preparations disappear, and the ability of herbalists to prescribe them will also be lost.

by Heidi Stevenson

 

12 September 2010

Big Pharma has almost reached the finish line of its decades-long battle to wipe out all competition. As of 1 April 2011—less than eight months from now—virtually all medicinal herbs will become illegal in the European Union. The approach in the United States is a bit different, but it’s having the same devastating effect. The people have become nothing more than sinks for whatever swill Big Pharma and Agribusiness choose to send our way, and we have no option but to pay whatever rates they want.

Big Pharma and Agribusiness have almost completed their march to take over every aspect of health, from the food we eat to the way we care for ourselves when we’re ill. Have no doubt about it: this takeover will steal what health remains to us.

 

From: gaia-health.com/articles301/000301-big-pharma-scores-big-win-medicinal-herbs-disappear-eu.shtml
 
Princeton Researchers find that High Fructose Corn Syrup prompts Considerably More Weight Gain
A Princeton University research team has demonstrated that all sweeteners are not equal when it comes to weight gain: Rats with access to high-fructose corn syrup gained significantly more weight than those with access to table sugar, even when their overall caloric intake was the same.

In addition to causing significant weight gain in lab animals, long-term consumption of high-fructose corn syrup also led to abnormal increases in body fat, especially in the abdomen, and a rise in circulating blood fats called triglycerides. The researchers say the work sheds light on the factors contributing to obesity trends in the United States.

“Some people have claimed that high-fructose corn syrup is no different than other sweeteners when it comes to weight gain and obesity, but our results make it clear that this just isn’t true, at least under the conditions of our tests,” said psychology professor Bart Hoebel, who specializes in the neuroscience of appetite, weight and sugar addiction. “When rats are drinking high-fructose corn syrup at levels well below those in soda pop, they’re becoming obese — every single one, across the board.”

 
See: princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S26/91/22K07/index.xml?section=topstories
 
AND, RE THE DANGERS OF HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP:

Child diabetes blamed on food sweetener

 
by Lois Rogers

Scientists have proved for the first time that a cheap form of sugar used in thousands of food products and soft drinks can damage human metabolism and is fuelling the obesity crisis.Fructose, a sweetener derived from corn, can cause dangerous growths of fat cells around vital organs and is able to trigger the early stages of diabetes and heart disease.It has increasingly been used as a substitute for more expensive types of sugar in yoghurts, cakes, salad dressing and cereals. Even some fruit drinks that sound healthy contain fructose.Experts believe that the sweetener — which is found naturally in small quantities in fruit — could be a factor in the emergence of diabetes among children. This week, a new report is expected to claim that about one in 10 children in England will be obese by 2015.

 
see: timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/health/article6954603.ece

 

WHAT IS THE US GOVERNMENT CONSIDERING?

The Corn Refiners Association, which represents firms that make the syrup, has been trying to improve the image of the much maligned sweetener with ad campaigns promoting it as a natural ingredient made from corn. Now, the group has petitioned the United States Food and Drug Administration to start calling the ingredient “corn sugar,” arguing that a name change is the only way to clear up consumer confusion about the product.”

see: The New York Times, Sept. 14, 2010, article by Tara Parker-Pope

 

NOTE: In my opinion, high fructose corn syrup is almost as dangerous as cigarettes, and all foods with this toxic substance as an ingredient MUST be labelled as dangerous and obesity causing. If the FDA were truly an organization for serving consumers, they would require this kind of labelling. However, the FDA is merely a shill for the chemical, pharmaceutical, bio-tech, Big Agra and Big Pharma companies.

There is a pattern at work in the world. The pattern is the slow but steady erosion of civil liberties and individual rights. These are handed over to Big Business so that the few can make money at the expense of the many. BEWARE.


 
Hereafter: Compelling, heartwarming
· · · ·

Hereafter: Compelling, heartwarming

At some point, during the birth of my last child, I passed.

My now 5 year old munchkin’s head was too big for my pelvis, something my doctor and I only reluctantly concluded after a long span of fruitless pushing. I’d delivered two babies properly, after all. We were confident I’d be able to do it again.

It was supposed to be a 1 hour c-section. It turned into a whole night affair. After my daughter was pulled out, the doctors brusquely hustled her and my husband out of the operating room. I don’t remember much after that. I woke up once when I wasn’t supposed to, asked a question, and watched a group of doctors jump, startled. In retrospect, that was funny.

I was told that there was a lot of bleeding that couldn’t be stopped. A surgical team was called in, not once, but twice. I was given a transfusion. Later, a few times, I asked my doctor what really happened. All she would say is, “There was more blood than I’d ever seen before.”
How do you know when a medical procedure has gone terribly wrong? When doctors clam up with a sick expression on their faces. They don’t want to say a word because they fear litigation. I wouldn’t have sued. I had a healthy baby. I like and trust this doctor, she delivered my older girls, too.
On some level, I know what happened, and not because a team of surgeons showed up the next morning, demanding to operate because they’d never found the bleeder. I refused. I intended to nurse my infant. Another operation jeopardized that. They got pushy and I pushed back, and we called in my OBS, who brokered a deal: if my blood pressure didn’t drop over the next several hours, there’d be no operation.
My blood pressure remained stable, as I’d known it would. During the worst part of the previous night, when the doctors wouldn’t tell my husband what was going on and then he suddenly felt my absence, he phoned my healer friend Thomas. “I need your help,” Sabin said. “I don’t want to raise this baby by myself.” Thomas called Gerda, she called someone, and a healing circle was set up. And not just any healing circle: my friends are powerful, long time healers–healers of healers. And I was lucky they were.
Before the circle worked its magic–and the surgeons and transfusion worked theirs–I experienced something. I haven’t spoken of it much because it wasn’t the classic tunnel-and-white-light experience that gets a lot of airtime. Also because I didn’t know what to say about it. Even I, who have spent serious time and effort researching the far bounds of mysticism and consciousness, I didn’t know what to say about it. Also because it was a deep thing. It’s hard to discuss.
But my experience is clearly alluded to in Clint Eastwood’s new movie HEREAFTER. I listened with shock and relief as the Swiss doctor described exactly what I experienced. It was an electrifying and humbling moment.
But I wouldn’t have needed the personal validation to enjoy the movie. HEREAFTER is poignant, sweet, intense. Three people deal with death and the afterlife in ways that are somber, human, and deeply affecting. There are some funny moments; the boy Marcus’ journey to make contact with his dead twin has some painful comedy to it. There’s a rumor about Matt Damon and an Oscar run. I think he deserves it. His reluctant psychic is pitch perfect. The French journalist Marie is extremely appealing, and the French language scenes work exactly right.
I liked the brief mention that researchers into the afterlife face pressure and even censorship by religious groups. That rings true to me. What I experienced the night my daughter was born–and what I’ve experienced in altered states during meditation–has nothing to do with any religion. I mean, I don’t mind religion, mostly, except when one religion is persecuting another. I just think that Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Islam, Buddhism, etc. have almost nothing to do with the life and existence of the soul. They’re just taxonomy seeking expression.
The screenplay feels classically screenplay-ish, by which I mean that it’s well structured, follows all the rules, and will be analyzed to death by screenwriting classes. But that’s not a bad thing. I like structure. When it works, it gives a story its power. The interweaving of these three arcs, and the redemption that the three protagonists experience because they come together, is cathartic, transformative. I was deeply moved. Everyone in the audience seemed to be, also. Perhaps my husband Sabin said it best, when we walked out: “At last, a Hollywood movie that’s not for retards.”