Immortal Goes Flying!

Immortal Goes Flying!

My wonderful, long-time friend Geoffrey Knauth, who is a pilot among all his many accomplishments (like being fluent in several languages, including Russian and French), sent me this image of his lovely wife Dr. Robin Knauth. She took my novel along for a ride in their airplane.
Now, Geoffrey is no slouch, having been the cox for the Harvard crew team. But Robin is a super-genius, and a professor, and a distinguished biblical scholar. It gave me a nervous thrill to imagine her perusing my tome. Especially given that she has the education and wherewithal to know… where I misconstrued radical Manichaean dualism… The liberties I took with the Gnostic gospels…. What I stole from different mythologies in the name of telling a story.
Robin is as kind as she is brilliant. I am assured that she will read with an eye toward giving me the benefit of the doubt. This is really a question of my own neurosis, which I try to keep in check.–What is ego that thou art mindful of it?–I am grateful for every reader, from the super-geniuses like Robin to the people like me who want to curl up with an absorbing tale!

Mac User Desperately Seeking HP printer driver

MWF, of a certain age, 4 kids, yellow lab almost 1 year old, loves her intel iMac, can’t get her HP laserjet 4100 to print more than 12 pages.

Note: the yellow lab hasn’t eaten the USB cable, and the F in question writes novels, so regularly churns out 400 page documents.
iMac and HP laserjet communicated sweetly with each other for 3 years, until two weeks ago when iMac ram upgraded.
Note: HP customer service collected $39 and then did not solve the problem. Two separate technicians muttered instructions that did not work, then promised to call back, and did not call back.
Additional note: novelist is a dedicated Mac user and is wondering which printers work well with Mac. Laserjet aforementioned is 8 years old and new printer is under consideration. If Hewlett Packard can’t get their act together to make sure their products work with Mac’s, the novelist won’t be buying an HP!
Novelist using Mac OSX 10.5.8.
THE PHYSICAL vs. THE FACEBOOK, by Jessica Hendel, (my beautiful daughter)

THE PHYSICAL vs. THE FACEBOOK, by Jessica Hendel, (my beautiful daughter)


The Physical vs. The Facebook
reprinted from The Indicator, volume XXVIII, issue 2, October 8, 2009
Exploring the effects of technology on our social lives.
I bring my phone with me everywhere. It sits in my backpack during class, next to my tray at Val and on that communal bench at the gym. It’s in my jacket pocket when I walk to town, and it’s charging on my desk at night. It’s in my purse at parties, or when I’m out seeing a movie, and when it isn’t in one of these places, it’s in my hand. My laptop, if not as frequent a companion, still manages to accompany me to most classes, to the library and even to Schwemm’s. Cut to Friday night. A few friends and I are scattered around the common room of my suite in Stone, casually watching TV and chatting. I’m sitting on the couch with my laptop on my knees, browsing Facebook. A friend of mine is checking her Blackberry. Another friend is playing an online game on his phone. I look around. Most people are either texting, IMing or playing with a phone or computer, while continuing to have a conversation and watch TV. We call this “hanging out.” Everyone is talking to each other, but no one is even looking at each other. We are all too busy distracting ourselves with various forms of digital technology.
This kind of activity is far from uncommon, especially in our age group. Generation Y grew up in an era of constant innovation in the area of electronics, and studies show that we use digital technology and the Internet with significantly more comfort and frequency than did members of earlier generations. From phones to computers to MP3 players, almost every college student is toting around a token of our electronic age. One question that inevitably rises from this nearly ubiquitous phenomenon is what sort of effect does it have on our social lives? In favor of exploring this, I’m going to disregard the academic merits of technology in order to delve into the inner workings of our culture’s most prevalent digital commodities, Internet sites and electronics companies, including a few possible reasons behind their widespread popularity. From this I hope to draw out an inquiry about the positive and negative effects that technology has had and continues to have on our social lives as young adults.
Looking at these issues, an appropriate place to start seems to be with the Blackberry. Over the past few years, Blackberry has grown into a common perpetrator of the coolphone-I-can-never-put-down frenzy. It began as the must-have handheld organizational tool among urban businessmen, quickly earning itself the nickname “Crack-berry” due to its owners’ penchants for incessant usage. But it soon spread into the realms of non-business and even teenage life. These days, as my 14-year-old sister desperately tried to explain to my mother over dinner one evening, “All the coolest girls in school have one!” Somehow, Blackberry made the transition from business tool to coveted socialite necessity, and Amherst can boast of at least as many Blackberry users as can any other elite liberal arts college campus in the nation.
On the other side of the marketing war, Apple and iPhone enthusiasts prove even more feverishly obsessed than their Crack-berry counterparts. Upon the release date of every slightly modified iPhone number-letter-letter, masses of consumers around the world pour into stores at 7 a.m. like churchgoers flocking to holiday services, ready to drop $300 or more to get their hands on the latest heavily marketed upgrade from Apple. As the self-deprecating owner of an iPhone, I have to admit to all of you-with shame-that I can totally dig it. Apple. You’re not even supposed to capitalize it.
Even now something about it looks wrong, like it’s lost some of its cool, its accessibility. It’s not even just that Steve Jobs meticulously crafted every detail of that company, from product design to customer support, to make it as universally appealing as possible. Or perhaps it’s just that. Without Jobs’ creative and organizational genius, Apple wouldn’t be the poster boy for friendly-yet-competent modernism that it is today. Cultish followers aside, people widely consider Macs to be the most “trustworthy” and “user-friendly” computers out there. Some even think that the iPhone is the biggest step forward in digital technology since the computer itself. It’s hardly surprising that Apple has made its presence felt on college campuses like our own. Between iPods and MacBooks alone you can hardly go an hour at Amherst without spying that gracious Apple logo somewhere-far beyond academic settings-with its preoccupied owner typing away.
And yet, whether you own a Mac or a PC, an iPhone or a Blackberry, or even a mobile phone less worthy of worshipping, the underlying question remains the same: why are we all continuously using, coveting and even obsessing over digital technology? The answer seems to be that the motivations behind this cultural fascination are primarily social in nature. Whether it’s via texting, IMing, online gaming or Facebooking, most facets of digital technology provide some means for an individual to plug into a social network that is different from the one he or she is physically in.
Recognizing this phenomenon, it becomes easier to detect the seductiveness of the Blackberry. Aside from being almost as multifaceted as the iPhone, it has one other “improvement” that all other cellular phones lack: Blackberry Messaging. Blackberry Messaging, or BBM, is a messaging system that only works among Blackberry users (you need to provide your contacts’ PIN numbers). Unlike regular text messaging, you can scroll through the entire message thread as if it were an IM, so it’s more similar to a sustained conversation than separate texts. More importantly, BBM lets you see when your contact has read your message and when he or she is typing a response. It holds all the allure of bourgeois exclusivity while also providing even more intimacy (and even less options for escape) than texting or Instant Messaging. None of your BBM contacts have the option of ignoring you and getting away with it. It isn’t hard to see how readily these novelties play into both the friendliest and the cattiest aspects of our social lives.
And yet not even the ex-girlfriend infuriating capacities of BBM can compare to the innovations of one of the most popular Internet sites ever created: Facebook. Facebook along with MySpace (although the latter has declined somewhat in popularity since Facebook gained prominence) are the most widely used vehicles within our age group, in particular for the type of activity we call “social networking.” On a psychological level, these sites hold an undeniable appeal. Aside from the patent enticement of being able to essentially stalk any friend (or enemy) of your choosing without fear of being discovered, you also receive a web page entirely devoted to the online reinvention of yourself, complete with interest lists and hundreds of pictures for anyone you allow to see (which for many people is a thousand or more of their peers). The imaged representation of one’s self along with the secured anonymity of its viewers gives the ordinary individual an opportunity to become a sort of pocket-celebrity. Everyone gets to showcase himself, and everyone gets to judge other people’s showcases. This development has essentially redefined what it means to be a young person living in our society. With Facebook available for 24-hour use, more and more of us find ourselves checking it multiple times a day, and spending a considerable amount of time overall on the addictive website.
So what do we lose by continuously tuning into these nonphysical social networks? For one thing, we lose the ability to enjoy a night out without someone stopping the festivities for five minutes of contrived photo taking. For God’s sake Jim, I’m a doctor, not a professional model. Much more importantly, we lose a considerable amount of privacy. Facebook has given us a way to live our lives on a stage, and with everyone from our best friends to our most arbitrary acquaintances watching, can we truly say that our lives are still our own private matter? Privacy can be defined as “freedom from the observation, intrusion or attention of others.” Our generational compulsion to showcase ourselves on the Internet seems mutually exclusive with that concept. This applies to cellphone use as well. Can we say that we have privacy when we can’t even ignore a BBM at any hour without the person knowing? Can we ever say that we’re safe from the “intrusion or attention of others,” when we can be called or texted at virtually any time? It’s becoming necessary to reassess what the concept of privacy even means within the context of a digitalized lifestyle.
Linked to that idea is the notion of independency. A part of any healthy social life is the ability to be comfortable apart from it, to be independent. In this day and age, can a college student call himself an independent individual, or is he, along with all of us, already dependent on electronics? How much do we count on the digital diversions from physical reality that are always immediately available? In the words of the lategreat George Carlin, perhaps we all need to “turn off the Internet, the CD-ROMs and the computer games and .. stare at a tree for a couple of hours.” Why? Just so we can remember what it’s like to be alone. I doubt many of us students can say that we often spend the day truly alone, sans cellphone and all.
These are ideas that we, as the generation of digital technology-users, need to bring into the collective consciousness. However, I said that I would look at technology’s merits, so I’ll take the time to mention that we would be largely out of contact with many of our friends in distant places without the invention of cellphones, computers and the Internet. The course of our Westernized lives involves at least a few changing of schools and institutions in which we take part. Innovations like texting and Facebook have made it vastly easier for us to keep in contact with our friends from our younger lives when we move on to different colleges, universities or even different countries. We can remain in touch with almost anyone we have met. I myself still maintain an email correspondence with a girl my age whose family hosted me when I stayed in France a few summers ago. Given the relative labor-intensiveness of snail mail, I don’t know if we would have still kept in contact with each other if email hadn’t been invented. The ease of reaching out to faraway friends, family and acquaintances is a great thing, and by no means do I aim to devalue such benefits in this article. I’m sure the Amherst students who hail from different parts of the world can attest to that.
I do however hope that we can all weigh the benefits of nonphysical interpersonal contact with the cheapening of other important aspects of life. Ask yourself: How much do I really care about my privacy? My independence? How much do I even care about living in the moment? There’s a happy balance somewhere between these concerns, but we have to remember that the trade-off for close contact across distances is that we’re less connected to the friends right in front of us, and maybe even to ourselves.
Jessica Hendel ’12 is a Contributing Writer for The Indicator, a fortnightly journal of social and political thought at Amherst College.

Alternatives to Talk Psychotherapy

NOTE: Nothing in this blog is intended to diagnose, treat, prevent, or cure illness. This blog is one woman’s opinion, and my opinions are constantly evoluting as I grow, learn, experience, and change my mind.

People need help.
The Buddha wasn’t wrong: this world is a vale of tears. The inevitability of loss stalks us throughout our lives, as does the essential loneliness of the human condition. Even love, which I see as Divine, sometimes connects us one to another only tenuously, through pain and suffering, isolation and despair. This doesn’t take into account the deeper, more profound, organic ills, the schizophrenias, manic depressions, psychotic breaks from reality, criminal psychopathy, and so on.
I simply do not see contemporary talk psychotherapy as the answer.
For one, it takes too long. For two, there’s brain scan evidence that it re-traumatizes the brain. For three, too much talk therapy arises out of a relativistic paradigm where proactive personal honor and the hard work of integrity are not valued; it’s all about what Caroline Myss calls ‘woundology.’ It’s about making excuses and prolonging self-pity. It is disempowering. Four, too much psychotherapy is anti-spiritual, and so the therapy is powered by only 1 horse out of the available 1,000,000 that come with a sense of the larger wonder and mystery that is the Source of everything. Five, plenty of psychotherapists and psychiatrists are loony.
But people need help. We all do, at some point in our lives.
Fortunately, there are alternatives. Here are some that I’ve discovered along the way.
First, because I am a healer and I have seen with my own eyes the dramatic positive shifts people can make with hands-on or spiritual healing, I recommend that people investigate Barbara Brennan Healing science, reiki, and therapeutic touch.
The energetic modalities work because we are more than mechanistic organic beings. We have an X factor: consciousness. Consciousness is always in dynamic interplay with matter. The new physics explores this, by noting that the observer always influences the outcome of the experiment.
Consciousness makes an impact on the physical world. And as best we can tell with the science we have right now, consciousness can be better described by a vibratory wave model of energy-matter than by the old Newtonian model of the body (and the universe) as a grand machine. That is, as Richard Gerber writes in VIBRATIONAL MEDICINE: New Choices for Healing Ourselves,
“The Einsteinian paradigm as applied to vibrational medicine sees human beings as networks of complex energy fields that interface with physical/cellular systems. Vibrational medicine uses specialized forms of energy to positively affect those energetic systems that may be out of balance due to disease states. By rebalancing the energy fields that help to regulate cellular physiology, vibrational healers attempt to restore order from a higher level of human functioning.”
Gerber’s book is fascinating and explains the underpinnings of what he calls ‘vibrational medicine.’ I see it as why Reich was right, and Freud erred. Reich was trying to get to the energetic core of psychological disease. Reich wanted to treat the root, not the symptom. So he devised the orgone box for people to sit in so they could be charged up with healing energy.
Pierrakos’ work in Core Energetics comes out of Reich’s work, and Core Energetics is an efficacious modality. It works good. It sees the human being as a psychosomatic unity: body-mind-spirit-psyche are one indivisible unit. Affect the body, and the mind, psyche, and spirit are affected. Affect the psyche, and the mind, body, and spirit are changed. There is no extricating out one strand of the multifarious beings that we are! We are whole even when we have forgotten that.
And take a look at Hellinger’s Family Constellation work. It’s not widespread yet in the US but practitioners are around. In LOVE’S HIDDEN SYMMETRY: What Makes Love Work in Relationships, Hellinger and his co-authors write about the Greater Order of Love. “If you want love to flourish, you need to do what it demands and to refrain from doing what harms it. Love follows the hidden order of the Greater Soul.”
Hellinger approaches whole person healing from an energy systems viewpoint, from an understanding of conscience and balance in giving and taking, forgiveness and reconciliation, the systemic conscience of the greater whole, and the orders of love within the family. Fascinating, useful work. Personal story, that is, the drama of all the wrongs suffered since birth, is not encouraged. Hellinger is on to something, and people who do the family constellation work find resolution, greater wholeness, and greater peace.
EMDR, thought field therapy, and emotional freedom technique are essential tools for healing. EMDR makes use of the intense eye-brain connection; TFT and EFT have a foundation in the ancient system of energy meridians that run through the body and that connect body with mind through consciousness. I have personally experienced powerful, fast improvements using EFT. Take a look at the website emofree.com and at Maggie Phillip’s book FINDING THE ENERGY TO HEAL: How EMDR, Hypnosis, TFT, Imagery and Body-Focused Therapy Can Help Restore Mindbody Health.
Vitamins and herbal supplements are worth exploring. There’s a lot of research done regarding fish oil supplements and how they enhance brain function. I’ve read that magnesium can help with anxiety. In Europe, St. John’s wort is often prescribed for depression, and it has fewer side effects but is just as effective as the common psychopharmaceuticals.
When I was in college, I had a lot of mood swings and dark moods, and I felt as if I were at their mercy. Those were alleviated radically when I did two things in grad school: 1, went off birth control pills, and 2, exercised vigorously and regularly. Running and lifting weights got my blood pumping. They also sculpted my body, which gave me feelings of accomplishment and self-esteem. Plus, they were just fun!
During my divorce, a time which was heart-wrenchingly painful and sad for me, I started doing yoga regularly. I can’t say enough positive things about yoga. It’s magical. It’s miraculous. Everyone should do yoga, (as long as your doctor agrees). One friend dismissed yoga by saying, “Oh, it soothes the mental body.” But, as I have always found, the mind and the psyche are completely interwoven! Anything like yoga that has such a profound and positive effect on my mental body, and a strengthening and limbering effect on my physical body, can only help my psychological body!
To feel good emotionally, it really helps to have the body feel good. So: eat good food. A chocolate bar here and there isn’t going to condemn you to depression. But, in general, eat food that remembers where it came from. Eat lots of salads, greens, veggies, and fruit. Eat whole grains and lean meats.
In my opinion, everyone should avoid highly processed foods, high fructose corn syrup, and additives like MSG. People with autistic children are starting to get the word out that a wholesome diet has a profound affect on those children. See Jenny McCarthy’s website generationrescue.org. I suspect that the American diet of high fructose corn syrup, sugar, caffeine, and diet soda is poisoning us into psychological and physical illness and obesity–and the FDA is too compromised by industry and big pharma to tell us that truth.
So: here are some recommendations for where to get started with alternatives. This is not a comprehensive list. Send me others; I’ll revisit this topic.

The Failure of Contemporary Psychotherapy

I have blogged before on this issue: I am not a fan of contemporary psychotherapy. I’m not the only one who sees it as distorted; take a look at Bert Hellinger’s work.

For one, I have heard–I have not verified this, but I heard it from a trusted source with a PhD–that bran scan imaging shows that brains are re-injured after a traditional talk session. All that complaining about your mother and the traumas of your youth: stop it now. Spit it out once for catharsis, accept that you had a raw deal, and move on. Your brain will thank you.
Two, every shrink I know personally, outside the office as a private individual, is a complete wingnut. And I know several. Do they help others? I hope so. But they are, each and every one, so extremely nuts that it makes me wonder. I have a private image of a dance of insanities in the office.
Three, my observation is that therapy doesn’t build character and create happy, upstanding, generous-hearted people. Rather, it gives people justification to be selfish jerks. It seems to build self-involvement, the kind that arises from justifying any old nasty behavior on the basis of old wounds.
One woman I know who is a trained psychiatrist with a thriving practice is mean-spirited and unkind to other women–socially. I’ve experienced it, as have other women of my acquaintance. But there’s no discussing it with her. She immediately disappears into her own head in a tautological dream of her own mother issues. Which, frankly, no one but her is interested in. It’s a closed and airless system.
There is a fundamental flaw at the heart of contemporary psychotherapy the way it is currently practiced by so many therapists. That is, it is looking for excuses. It is looking to soothe narcissism rather than to build core values that lead to self-esteem and success.
By core values, I refer to 1, hard work; 2, self-discipline; 3, persistence; 4, deferred gratification; 5, kindness; and 6, personal honor. These are not glamorous, touchy feely fuzzy wuzzy notions that the aging children of the 60’s invented to prolong their adolescence. These are ancient, codified rules that have withstood the test of time.
Take a look at the Bible. The ten commandments are actually 14 or 15 imperatives, and I freely confess I’ve broken a bunch of them. To my own detriment every time. Here’s one I didn’t break (at least that I know!): “Don’t steal.” That picks up several of the core values mentioned above, like self-discipline, kindness, and personal honor. “Don’t lie about your neighbor” goes to the same values. “Don’t cheat on your spouse” goes to those same three, plus deferred gratification.
I didn’t observe the no-cheating commandment, and boy oh boy, do I wish I had. Not because I’m sorry my former marriage dissolved, but because I wish I’d accomplished that dissolution in a way that maintained the values I believe in, that continued to build me into the person I intend to be.
There are no short cuts. Self-esteem isn’t built from the outside, from your parents or your shrink or your community telling you that you’re a wonderful person. That feels real nice, sure. But the bottom line is that self-esteem is built from the inside, by doing the right thing, especially when it’s hard to do the right thing. Even when your parents, your shrink, and your community is telling you that you’re not a nice person for following the dictates of your conscience.
There is a difference between the quick thrill of immediate gratification, and the deeper, more intense sweetness of the long, slow road of integrity.
I think often of southpaw Jim Abbott, who was born without a right hand, and still became a pitcher in major league baseball. The internet says he pitched a no-hitter to the Indians in 1993, while he was a Yankee. Here’s a man who had every excuse in the world for NOT BEING A PROFESSIONAL ATHLETE. Contemporary psychotherapy would have let him off the hook a thousand ways to Sunday. But he didn’t fall for that load of crap. He worked hard, so hard he beat out thousands of gifted athletes with two whole arms, and became a pitcher for the Yankees.
I bet Mr. Abbott would have something to say about self-discipline, persistence, and deferred gratification.
There are no excuses.
I want to make it clear that I espouse the old values, but I dislike the old prejudices. I suspect that it was partly our collective attempt to be better people without the old prejudices that has led to the loss of the old values. But we threw the baby out with the dirty bathwater.
Gender, race, religion, and sexual preference are not the issue. They’re beside the point. Among gay and straight people, among black and white and yellow people, among Hindus and Jews and Muslims and Buddhists and Christians and atheists, there are people who practice self-discipline and honor and kindness, and people who don’t. Character is color-blind. There is a primary difference between external attributes, like skin color and sexual preference, and internal values, like honor and kindness.

KUDOS TO OXFORD HEALTH INSURANCE

OK, my husband and I pay an astronomical amount for crappy health insurance. It boggles my mind how exorbitant it is, but we have a young child and have to do it.

But, in the mail recently, I received an amendment to my policy saying that Oxford will now recognize as spouses the partners in same sex marriages, where those are allowed by law.
Yay! Another step in the road toward the dignity of marriage which any two consenting adults deserve, regardless of gender, race, religion, etc. I applaud Oxford for taking this step.
NOW, can they lower the rates to something reasonable?